Alaska and the Arctic
- Retreating and thinning arctic summer sea ice, increasing temperatures, and ocean acidification are increasingly affecting marine fish and wildlife habitats, species distributions, and food webs, all of which are important to people in the Arctic.
- Arctic residents, communities, and their infrastructure continue to be affected by permafrost thaw, coastal and river erosion, increasing wildfire, and glacier melt. As temperatures continue increasing, individuals and even whole communities will need to decide how and where to live.
- The temperature of permafrost soils in the Arctic is rising, leading to drier landscapes, more wildfire, altered wildlife habitat, and increased costs to maintain infrastructure. Warming and thawing of permafrost soils increases their release of carbon dioxide and methane, leading to further climate warming.
- Strong warming linked to reductions in the area of snow and ice can influence atmospheric circulation and precipitation patterns, both within the Arctic and around the world.
- A warming climate brings threats to human health, especially for rural residents who face increased risk of storm damage and flooding, loss of vital food sources, disrupted traditional practices, or relocation. Implementing proactive adaptation strategies would reduce the physical, social, and psychological harm likely to occur under a warming climate.
- The cumulative effects of climate change in the Arctic strongly affect Native communities and the ecosystems on which they depend. Though these communities have a deep cultural history of adapting to change, they are highly vulnerable to these rapid changes and intensifying impacts.
Scientific evidence demonstrates with increasing clarity and certainty that Earth’s climate is changing: it is becoming warmer and more variable, with more intense floods, storms, and droughts. It is also increasingly clear that higher levels of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere—the result of fossil-fuel emissions, land clearing, and agriculture—have contributed substantially to climate warming. However, the impacts of these changes in Earth’s climate system vary substantially from place to place. The Arctic, for example, is warming twice as fast as the planet as a whole. It is therefore important to understand these Arctic changes, not only because they are likely to be most readily observed in this temperature-sensitive region, but also because they provide insight into the general nature of resilience and vulnerability that may occur on the rest of the planet if climate continues to warm.
The Arctic is projected to continue warming much faster than the rest of the planet if greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in the atmosphere. Managing the responses of ecosystems and society to recent and projected warming requires that we understand not only the changes in climate, but also the changes in ecosystems and their cumulative effects on society. In particular, it is important to know how these processes interact and when these interactions lead to either non-linear (either magnifying or stabilizing) responses or threshold changes in the behavior of the system. Loss of sea ice, glaciers, or permafrost (permanently frozen ground), for example, might dramatically alter the Arctic for both ecosystems and society.
Arctic change is important to global society not only because of its impacts within the Arctic, but also because of the role of the Arctic in the climate of the entire Earth. The climate and the ocean circulation in all parts of the globe are affected by the temperature and pressure gradients between the poles and the equator. These temperature and pressure gradients are becoming weaker because the Arctic is warming faster than lower latitudes. The resulting changes in climate and weather will affect people everywhere.
Understanding change is the first step toward understanding and building Arctic resilience and reducing its vulnerability to climate change. Systems are resilient when system responses counteract changes that would otherwise have occurred—in other words, when there are stabilizing feedbacks. For example, if society were to adapt to climate warming by reducing fossil fuel emissions, this would reduce the rate of climate warming. Similarly, if Arctic peoples adapt to declining opportunities to hunt ice-dependent marine mammals by diversifying their food sources, this could stabilize their food supply. In ecological systems, a shift from coniferous to deciduous forests would replace flammable coniferous trees with less flammable deciduous ones, which counteracts the effect of rising temperature and drying soils on fire frequency and extent.
Unfortunately, most of the feedbacks and interactions involved in Arctic change are reducing the resilience of the Arctic. For example, the decline in cover of sea ice, glaciers, and snow cover replaces a white reflective surface with a darker, more absorptive surface of land or water. This increases the absorption of heat by the surface and thus increases the rate of Arctic warming. Similarly, increased fire extent, permafrost loss, decomposition, and methane emission in response to Arctic warming increases emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, and increases climate warming at the global scale—a decrease in climate resilience at the global scale. Adapting to Arctic changes in ways that increase Arctic resilience—for example, by reducing the soot deposition that darkens Arctic snow surfaces—will be a major challenge in the coming decades.
The preceding text is excerpted and abridged from the following sources:
- Arctic Climate Impact Assessment.
- Arctic Resilience Interim Report 2013.
- Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment (Chapter 22: Alaska).
- Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report.
The Artic impact pages look at how climate change is currently impacting the Arctic and how it will impact the Arctic in the future. These pages discuss just some of the major impacts—there may be other effects beyond what is described.