Assessing the Timing and Extent of Coastal Change in Western Alaska
- Gather all voices: Inclusive engagement is essential for effective climate resilience building. By facilitating input from diverse stakeholders, precise needs and priorities can be identified, leading to the creation of customized, versatile tools and resources that offer multiple benefits.
- Sharing is caring: Ensure that final reports and materials are publicly available and accessible. This equips decision makers with necessary information for accomplishing project objectives and maintaining positive project outcomes.
Recognizing the threat rising seas and eroding coastlines pose to western Alaskan coastal communities and cultural resources, regional stakeholders addressed coastal change issues and elevated procedural, cultural, and distributional equity. This group hosted coastal hazards workshops for diverse stakeholders to identify needs and priorities. Based on input, the group subsequently sponsored high-priority projects. By including, respecting, and celebrating different groups in decision-making processes and developing solutions, the group promoted procedural and cultural equity. The project ultimately developed a publicly available interactive map, ensuring accessibility to vital coastal change information. They empowered vulnerable communities to plan and respond effectively to coastal changes, and laid the groundwork for the advancement of distributional equity in future projects.
Click to read the full case study
Stressors and impacts
Alaska’s western coast has seen substantial changes in recent years. During 2013, the Village of Shishmaref saw 60 feet of shoreline vanish in a single storm. Over a five-year period, storms also removed 30 feet of shoreline at an ancient Yup’ik village near Quinhagak, increasing the urgency of archeologists and the community to protect this historic site. And recently, storm surges have flooded portions of the town of Golovin so frequently that residents made a decision to relocate some of their essential infrastructure to higher ground. These events illustrate the vulnerability of western Alaska’s coastal communities and cultural resouces to rising seas and eroding coastlines. As the region warms—and sea ice and land-fast ice that once protected coastlines during extreme storms disappears—the impacts of coastal erosion will only increase.
A 2015 report—Climate Change in the Bering Strait Region (PDF)—uses vivid photographs and direct quotes to document the vulnerability of Alaskan Native Villages to changing conditions. Residents' health and well-being are threatened by increasingly rapid changes that impact their daily lives. Coastal communities describe the unusual beach and shore erosion they have seen as potential health concerns: rapid changes along the coast can lead to injuries, reduce the stability of buildings, roads, and infrastructure for water and waste, and decrease food security. Coastal changes are also a concern for resource managers and subsistence and commercial fishing fleets. The extent of coastal change in the region has only been documented along short stretches of the coast, generally near communities, and the information is not always complete.
As the threat of coastal erosion increases along the thousands of miles of western Alaska’s coastline, communities, resource managers, and agencies that serve as stewards of the land need a way to monitor coastal change.
Seeking solutions
Issues of coastal change in the region fall within the purview of the Western Alaska Partnership, formerly the Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC). Until 2019, the LCC was one of 22 regional efforts across the United States launched to better integrate science and management in addressing climate change and other landscape-scale issues. The Western Alaska LCC was governed by a partnership of 14 state, federal, and tribal organizations with input from academia, agencies, non-profit organizations, consulting firms, and traditional knowledge experts.
In 2012, the Western Alaska LCC co-hosted a coastal hazards workshop with the Alaska Ocean Observing System and the Alaska Climate Science Center. At the workshop, a broad group of stakeholders identified their needs for information and tools that would help them understand and forecast how the coast is changing. The LCC sponsored or co-sponsored 17 projects to address recommendations offered by workshop participants.
One of the stakeholder needs identified at the workshop was for information that would enable decision makers to “assess changes in historic frequency, magnitude, and extent” of coastal erosion. To provide this capability, co-hosts of the workshop collaborated with Matthew Macander at ABR, Inc. to provide a coastal change map for the entire coastline within the LCC’s region.
Eyes in the sky
The collaborators developed a map of coastal change in western Alaska based on expert analyses of “before” and “after” Landsat imagery (see the Coastal Change Analyses for Western Alaska: Interactive Map tool in the sidebar). Analysts selected the best cloud-free satellite images from the Landsat archives from 1972 through 2013, and then analyzed visible differences to discern what changes had occurred in each decade over the 41 years. The project’s final map shows the extent and timing of coastal changes, detailing where erosion replaced land with water, as well as areas where deposition of sediments replaced water with land—a process known as aggradation.
The interactive map gives users a way to view portions of the time-series Landsat images as well as graphic layers from the image analyses. Users can find areas of extensive erosion along the coast and see when those changes occurred. They can also discern the timing and see the extent of areas where new land has built up near the mouths of rivers, or where lowland lakes and ponds have drained. Layers also show trends and “hotspots” where rapid or otherwise notable changes occurred—these flags can alert decision makers to areas they may want to monitor more closely.
Anticipating change, planning a response
A range of decision makers in western Alaska can use the tool to gain understanding of how coastal areas are changing and make plans for how they might respond. For example, vulnerable communities can identify stable sections of coastline where they could relocate essential infrastructure; archeologists can identify prehistoric sites that may be at risk; Alaska Natives can search for stable access to existing or new subsistence sites; and natural resource managers can make preliminary assessments of change to coastal habitats.
Publicly available since late 2014, the interactive map will be featured as one of the focus tools demonstrated at coastal resilience and adaptation meetings in several communities in western Alaska during the winter of 2015–2016. The large scale of the map and the careful image analysis layers will provide decision makers with information that can help them understand vulnerabilities and investigate options to build resilience to the impacts of coastal erosion.
Relevant Options
This selection of resilience actions from our Options Database is specifically tailored to address the hazards and assets identified in this case study. To explore other resilience actions that may be applicable to your community, visit the complete Options Database.
Karen A. Murphy, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Alaska ShoreZone